Open ValWood opened 6 years ago
These will be wee wee1 cpc2 cdr2 sgf73 srk1 pyp1
these will stay at the parent term: spp1 ace2 fkh2 atf1 dml1 loz1 mcs4 mak1 plb1 rad3 rad9 sck2 tor2 tsc2 sak1
mas5 the annotation to small needs deleting
int6 goes to the new term that will be a sibling of the "wee" term
lkh1 I wrote "reannotate" but did not say to what.
@JackyVH could you glance through the lists above and see if it looks correct?
this isn't difficult but there are Loads of annotations... I'm wondering if it might be quicker to
automagically move everything to the wee term, and then manually move back the non-wee ones (its a smaller gene set, and I suspect there will be fewer alleles and annotations)
Hi KIm,
Could you migrate all annotations to
FYPO:0000645 | small vegetative cell and FYPO:0000648 | viable small vegetative cell
to FYPO:0006822 then I will move back the smaller number to the correct parent.
Let me know when you plant to do it so I. can be sure. that I can put a couple of hours aside to do the fixes.
Could you migrate all annotations to
Are these annotation in Canto?
Hmm, they could be in Artemis. There should not be many in Artemis. I will probably deleted these and prioritise the papers. I will check in a sec.
some are in phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv I can deal with these.
phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPAC1782.09c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 clp1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPAC26F1.10c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 pyp1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPAC30C2.06c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 dml1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPBC106.10 FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 pka1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPBC16H5.07c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 ppa2delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 FYPO_EXT:0000001 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPBC1718.07c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 zfs1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPBC30B4.04c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 sol1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPCC126.04c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 sgf73delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPCC18.17c FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 SPCC18.17cdelta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 phaf_format_phenotypes.tsv:SPCC18B5.03 FYPO:0000648 deletion Null 975 h+ SP286 h+ ura4-D18 leu1-32 ade6-M210 wee1delta deletion Microscopy PECO:0000005,PECO:0000137 FYPO_EXT:0000001 PMID:23697806 4896 20120101 grep: phenotype_mapping_old: Is a directory
also
PMID_15797925_phaf.tsv:SPBC1734.11 FYPO:0000648 deletion null 972 h- deletion microscopy PECO:0000005 PMID:15797925 4896 2017-03-23 PMID_23695302_phaf.tsv:SPAC25B8.19c FYPO:0000648 wild type overexpression 972 h- h- leu1-32 wild type microscopy PMID:23695302 4896 2015-02-12 PMID_23695302_phaf.tsv:SPAC6G10.12c FYPO:0000648 wild type overexpression 972 h- h- leu1-32 wild type microscopy PMID:23695302 4896 2015-02-12
my share: update ID in PHAFs for wee1, cpc2, cdr2, sgf73, srk1
did my bit
I got a bit confused on the call. Is this all still the plan?:
Could you migrate all annotations to FYPO:0000645 | small vegetative cell and FYPO:0000648 | viable small vegetative cell to FYPO:0006822 then I will move back the smaller number to the correct parent.
Are there any exceptions? Should this be applied to all genes and annotations in Canto?
Hi, sorry for the delay. I got side-tracked. This is still the plan.
It applies to any annotation in Canto or Artemis (there should not be any in Artemis) Midori has done the PHAF files.
v
That's done now. In case it's useful, here's what changed:
OK I moved up the ones I do not think are wee. I'll review tomorrow and ask Jacky
reviewed with @JackyVH
wee annotations that need to be checked
wee annotation to remove
viable small cell to check
review of wee