Open mah11 opened 4 years ago
could also upgrade the interactions in PMID:32341083
PMID:32053662 there is a genetic interaction between Ssp2 and Gsk3/Gsk31, and Ssp2 and Gsk3/Gsk31 may act on parallel pathway in regulation of Sre1 activity
from https://github.com/pombase/curation/issues/2540
Genetic interactions of dmfl with other genes required for septation Strains carrying either the dmfl-6 or dmfl ::ura4+alleles were crossed to strains carrying either cdc3-6, cdc4-8, cdc7-24, cdc8-110, cdc11-136, cdc12-112, cdc14-118, cdcl 5-140, or cdcl 6-116. The null allele is synthetically lethal with cdc4-8 and cdc3-6, and the restrictive tem- perature of double mutants with cdc7-24 and cdc15-140 was reduced to 25~ Double mutants with dmfl-6 showed less severe effects, but dmfl-6 cdc4-8, dmfl-6 cdc7-24, and dmfl-6 cdc15-140 all have a reduced non- permissive temperature compared with the single mutants.
mid1 paper is https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:8946912
MariaSanta's paper is https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:31509478
This paper illustrates why we really need to be able to use "suppression" and "enhancement" with specific genotypes and phenotypes.
The single mutants are already "high expressivity" but subsequent additions enhance the phenotype more and we run out of "expressivity". we need really high and really really high!
In this session I adjusted to low, medium, high but this isn't ideal when you have subtle enhancements. It will be so much better when we can do this in the GI interface and select genotype A phenotype Y enhanced by genotype B....
22 supressors in PMID:34028542 where ther author has nicely included the alleles and phenotypes in the comment
PMID:34279633 imp1/cdc15 double mutants would be good GI interface candidates (not curated in test)
PMID:34292936 different alleles of pcn1 have opposite effects on rad51delta GRC rate
PMID:33534698 I can't reconcile this:
====
PMID:34738170 [Kaoru Takegawa] session in approval
https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:34389684 (author recorded the alleles in the GI section)
https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:34958661 (session not in test)
PMID:15546915 GI->phenotype connection recorded in comments partially suppresses hypersensitivity to Cal- cofluor (Cfw) and Echinocandin (Ech) but does not rescue lysis at 37°C in the ehs2-1 mutant (Tajadura et al., 2004).
author recorded phenotype
PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity PMID:32034465 camptothecin sensitivity PMID:32034465 camptothecin sensitivity PMID:32034465 formaldehyde sensitivity
PMID:24239120 Fig. S1 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324) PMID:24239120 Fig. S1 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324) PMID:24239120 Fig. S1 (This is a partial rescue of FYPO:0004307) PMID:24239120 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324) PMID:24239120 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324) PMID:24239120 (This is a partial rescue of FYPO:0004307) PMID:24239120 Fig. 2 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0004395) PMID:24239120 Fig. 2 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0004395) PMID:24239120 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0004395 and FYPO:0004101 partially) PMID:24239120 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0004395) PMID:24239120 Fig. 2 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324) PMID:24239120 (This is a rescue of FYPO:0000324)
PMID:32204793 https://github.com/pombase/curation/issues/2675 from author:
"The sfr1 deletion mutant is sensitive to DNA damage by itself, and this sensitivity is enhanced by deletion of rad55 or rad57. By contrast, the amino acid substitution mutants do not show any DNA damage sensitivity by themselves. However, in the absence of rad55 or rad57, they do show a synergistic negative interaction."
also see helpdesk ticket 7670