par1 / SPCC188.02 modification: multiple "added_during()" relations

[kimrutherford]

Should this be split into two annotations, one for "added during mitotic anaphase" and one for "added during mitotic metaphase"?

https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPCC188.02

[kimrutherford]

Some other cases:

SPAC3G9.09c   tif211  MOD:00046   Inferred from Direct Assay    S52   added_during(GO:0000080),added_during(GO:0006974)       PMID:19033384   4896    2013-11-14
SPAC3G9.09c   tif211  MOD:00046   Inferred from Direct Assay    S52   added_during(GO:0000080),added_during(GO:0071494)       PMID:19033384   4896    2013-11-14
SPAC3G9.09c   tif211  MOD:00046   Inferred from Direct Assay    S52   added_during(GO:0000084),added_during(GO:0071494)       PMID:19033384   4896    2013-11-14
SPAC3G9.09c   tif211  MOD:00046   Inferred from Direct Assay    S52   added_during(GO:0000085),added_during(GO:0071494)       PMID:19033384   4896    2013-11-14

This is similar but maybe it makes sense to have a single annotation for present_during(X) AND present during(Y)? It seems like a different case.

SPAC9E9.08    rad26   MOD:00696   Inferred from Direct Assay          present_during(GO:0000085),present_during(GO:0006974)   PMID:10559981   4896    2018-10-22

[ValWood]

these ones are OK, phase + process