vegetative vs non-vegetative (protein modification)

[ValWood]

Users might find this odd:

[ValWood]

so, when you drill down there are non vegetative modification terms, but for some you need to look under the vegetative term. Then when you go to the vegetative term, the modifications are not named vegetatively.

I don't think it usually matters, but it seems strange here when we will clearly need to change to "vegetative" eventually. Might be worth calling these vegetative now, and adding a non-vegetative parent for clarity.

[mah11]

I can edit term names; I won't bother adding generic parents until we need them to group any siblings that are actually not vegetative (as opposed to unspecified).

[ValWood]

Yeah that makes sense...

[mah11]

have started this slog; it's going to take several goes 'cos it's too tedious to do all at once

[ValWood]

oh I thought you were only doing it for these terms....

I think it makes sense where the terms are split like this.... we can say when it looks a bit odd when we "drill down"

[mah11]

yeah, I'm mainly just doing the protein modification branch for now, but there are tons because of all the histone this-or-that-modification on this-or-that residue terms ...

[mah11]

I've got as much of this done as I wanted to for this ticket, namely the protein modification branch. Open a new ticket for the next area that should get the refit (preferably not too soon ;) ).

[ValWood]

yep will avoid that for a while...