Closed fypoadmin closed 9 years ago
Actually the parent has this,
A cell population phenotype in which all vegetative cells arising from a population of germinated spores are inviable. The population may be mixed with respect to other phenotypes (e.g. whether cell division occurs).
which seems OK, because this term is more general and can apply to any post germination cell. The children are a bit different because here we are saying the population is inviable with abnormal germ tube morphology. I assumed this to mean that the arrested cells have abnormal germ tube morphology (Although I guess it could mean that some cells have abnormal germ tube morphology, divide and die???, I don't think we use it like that do we.....I'm a bit brain dead today...only a few 100 rows to go.....)
Original comment by: ValWood
The "population may be mixed with respect to other phenotypes" can only apply to a population phenotype, so no, it doesn't come from the cell phenotype definition.
It was copied from the parent, but can be removed from the FYPO:0002214 def if it isn't relevant.
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: mah11
deleted that bit of FYPO:002214 def
Original comment by: mah11
I think this applies also to FYPO:0002218 val
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: mah11
FYPO:0002218 def edited
Original comment by: mah11
FYPO:0002214 inviable vegetative cell population after spore germination, abnormal germ tube morphology
is defined A cell population phenotype in which all vegetative cells arising from a population of germinated spores are inviable, and have germ tubes with abnormal morphology. The population may be mixed with respect to other phenotypes (e.g. whether cell division occurs).
but as this is the population term, and the population is all
inviable vegetative cell after spore germination, abnormal germ tube morphology this "The population may be mixed with respect to other phenotypes (e.g. whether cell division occurs)" doens't apply yo the population term does it? (is this copy pasted from the cellular phenotype?)
val
Original comment by: ValWood