Closed ValWood closed 6 months ago
This is a small task that can be slotted in some time, but I don't know if there are any, so maybe they are filtered anyway (do we filter protein binding from Complex Portal? I think we might? in which case this can close)
this is largely a duplicate (because I think Complex Portal is the only source) https://github.com/pombase/pombase-chado/issues/1001
There are only 35 pombe annotations that are assigned by ComplexPortal. Are those the ones you're thinking of here?
Only 5 of those have a with/from and in those 5 cases the value is "ComplexPortal:CPX-565".
OK do we load those?
OK do we load those?
Yep, those numbers were from Chado queries.
Although now when I query again I see only 23 annotations assigned_by ComplexPortal and 4 annotations have a "with" value that's a ComplexPortal ID.
These are the 4 annotations with a "with":
SPAC140.01 | mitochondrial respiratory chain complex II, succinate dehydrogenase complex (ubiquinone)
SPAC140.01 | tricarboxylic acid cycle
SPCC330.12c | tricarboxylic acid cycle
SPAC1556.02c | tricarboxylic acid cycle
I don't think these should be in GO, since GO is representing normal, actual biology. The only inter-species protein-protein interactions should be between host and pathogen proteins.
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/4241
so, we should filter any annotation with a non pombe uniprot Id in the with filed.
Not urgent