pombase / pombase-chado

PomBase code for accessing Chado
MIT License
5 stars 3 forks source link

A query BioGRID types #599

Closed ValWood closed 9 months ago

ValWood commented 7 years ago

BIOGRID are changing the way that genetic interactions are described

I'm trying to make a plan (no hurry to implement, might take 2 years, but there might be small changes we could make to curation procedures now, to makes the eventual transition easier).

I will address the existing "types" one by one on the curation tracker first and curators can make a plan.

So for now I have a question. Could you let me know how many annotations we have to each GI term (synthetic lethal etc) (Is there anywhere I can look this up? I think there might be but I can't remember where it is)

ValWood commented 9 months ago

first part of this, getting the numbers, I put at high priority so we can see what we have

kimrutherford commented 9 months ago

It's easy to query Chado to get all the legacy interactions, but harder to query the genotype-genotype interactions.

Are these the numbers you were after?:

Old style genetic interactions:

interaction_type evidence count
interacts_genetically Dosage Growth Defect 98
interacts_genetically Dosage Lethality 94
interacts_genetically Dosage Rescue 1164
interacts_genetically Negative Genetic 67112
interacts_genetically Phenotypic Enhancement 1586
interacts_genetically Phenotypic Suppression 1890
interacts_genetically Positive Genetic 29482
interacts_genetically Synthetic Growth Defect 5422
interacts_genetically Synthetic Lethality 3241
interacts_genetically Synthetic Rescue 1612

Physical interactions:

interaction_type evidence count
interacts_physically Affinity Capture-Luminescence 3
interacts_physically Affinity Capture-MS 8618
interacts_physically Affinity Capture-RNA 456
interacts_physically Affinity Capture-Western 2637
interacts_physically Biochemical Activity 586
interacts_physically Co-crystal Structure 190
interacts_physically Co-fractionation 143
interacts_physically Co-localization 35
interacts_physically Co-purification 880
interacts_physically FRET 9
interacts_physically Far Western 35
interacts_physically PCA 1401
interacts_physically Protein-RNA 23
interacts_physically Protein-peptide 84
interacts_physically Proximity Label-MS 303
interacts_physically Reconstituted Complex 1559
interacts_physically Two-hybrid 3762

Note to self:

select p.value as evidence, rel_t.name as interaction_type, count(rel.feature_relationship_id)  from feature_relationship rel join feature_relationshipprop p on rel.feature_relationship_id = p.feature_relationship_id join cvterm pt on pt.cvterm_id = p.type_id join cvterm rel_t on rel.type_id = rel_t.cvterm_id where rel_t.name like '%interact%' and pt.name = 'evidence' group by p.value, rel_t.name order by rel_t.name, p.value;
ValWood commented 9 months ago

OK, thanks. I wondered if we used them all consistently thats all, it seems all are fairly well used. I'm going to close this ticket, until prompted by BIOGRID, because I can't remember what the pending changes were, maybe they never happened?