Closed ValWood closed 4 weeks ago
I wonder if we want something like this graph but cumulative? But to simplify thing, perhaps all the uncurated papers should be grouped together rather than splitting into assigned and unassigned.
I'll add this to my list of issues to discuss on a call sometime.
Yes probably, I think people don't often understand this graph is based on date published /vs data curated and and think we are curating less.
Remember to use date of first approval
Here's how it looks with two extra lines. I'm still working of making a stacked plot:
First attempt at a stacked graph. Are the labels OK?:
That looks great. labels: maybe if the title is "Publication Status" we can remove the word "papers" from uncurated
We do need to get community curation up! But at least uncurated is going down consistently.
labels: maybe if the title is "Publication Status" we can remove the word "papers" from uncurated
How's this?
Great!
OK, I'll swap it over. The change will be on pombase.org on Saturday morning.
It would be useful to have two more lines on this graph.
1 community curated 1 pombase curated
This year our overall rate is really good since we are only half way through the year. At the moment we are definitely curating more than published.