Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Ooops, sorry. That's the output I see instead:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/feedparser.py", line 2651, in <module>
result = parse(url)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/feedparser.py", line 2633, in parse
feedparser.feed(data)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/feedparser.py", line 1450, in feed
sgmllib.SGMLParser.feed(self, data)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/sgmllib.py", line 104, in feed
self.goahead(0)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/sgmllib.py", line 186, in goahead
self.handle_charref(name)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/feedparser.py", line 508, in handle_charref
c = int(ref)
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'a'
Original comment by worbynet@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 10:17
Just in case the error dissapears as new feed items come in and older go out, I
pulled down the feed with wget (wget http://feed_url -O VistoenFB.wget) and I
am attaching it here.
Original comment by worbynet@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 3:08
Attachments:
Please download and test this issue on feedparser 5.0.1; I'm not seeing an
exception with the new version.
Feedparser 4.1 was released five years ago, and package maintainers have been
notified of the new release, so hopefully it'll get to you soon! :)
Original comment by kurtmckee
on 4 Mar 2011 at 6:01
Great to hear! Thanks and sorry for the inconveniences.
Will wait for the Debian package maintainers to update it (although feedparser
5 version is quite new!).
Original comment by worbynet@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2011 at 10:15
Hey, no inconvenience; I'd like to see feedparser be the best software it can
be, and bug reports are one way to achieve that. I'm going to close this
report, but if you download 5.0.1 and move feedparser.py to wherever your code
is at and still find that there's a bug, don't hesitate to come back to this
report!
Original comment by kurtmckee
on 5 Mar 2011 at 5:28
Test done. It became successfull =) Thanks again!
Original comment by worbynet@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2011 at 10:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
worbynet@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2011 at 10:04