Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Please give an example of what you are thinking.
Original comment by jbel...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2009 at 1:47
lets say we have a model that we want to have a textarea field, it accepts rows
and
cols as parameter, which kinda does the trick , but in modern approach it would
be
more approperiate to add style="height:255px" for example - this is quite
crucial for
situations when we want to attach some kind of RTE to the field
other situation where i think that one may need the ability to specify custom
tags
are RIA applications, its very common to pass some params as encoded class
names like
class="id-55 active drag-and-drop-enabled" etc. then selector engines are
reading the
values and parse them into meaningful data for widgets etc.
Original comment by ergo14@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2009 at 5:29
The purist in me says that these should be done with css, but I recognize that
in
practice it can be useful to have quick & dirty options available, so I would
accept
a patch for this. There is the beginnings of a hook for this already in
fields.py
(look for html_attributes) but about 90% of the work remains. :)
Original comment by jbel...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2009 at 2:48
yup, im a purist too, and i use css, BUT there are onclicks and other useful
attribs
as well ;-)
Original comment by ergo14@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2009 at 5:33
This adds almost nothing, except some documentation and the support for
.options()
which sends specified options to final renderers. The webhelpers fork used in
here
will render them as separate HTML attributes when they don't match renderers
options.
This patch also highlights the availability of the same functionalities on the
render() functions. This should work also with home-brew renderers, based on
the new
WebHelpers 0.6 for example, if someone wanted to have some customer renderers.
Comments are welcome
Original comment by wackysa...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2009 at 3:49
Attachments:
Applied with changes:
- renamed .options to .with_html
- removed **html_options from render methods
Thanks!
Original comment by jbel...@gmail.com
on 23 Mar 2009 at 6:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ergo14@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2009 at 9:16