Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This makes linking fail on OSX using clang++ (3.0) with -std=c++0x and
-stdlib=libc++. The attached patch fixes the problem, which is that strstream
doesn't exist with these options.
Original comment by joaodasilva@chromium.org
on 22 Jan 2012 at 1:50
Attachments:
Can we also replace ostrstream with ostringstream ?
Original comment by Van...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2012 at 10:49
Here is a patch that replaces strstream with stringstream and removes inclusion
of deprecated header.
Signed the "Individual Contributor License Agreement" form, so you can use the
code.
Original comment by Van...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2012 at 2:03
Attachments:
Oops, seems like ostringstream doesn't support specifying char buffer as a
backend. Sad :(
Original comment by Van...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2012 at 2:38
I think I can implement a custom std::stringbuf as suggested here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1494182/setting-the-internal-buffer-used-by-a
-standard-stream-pubsetbuf
Or just copy output string using stringstream::str() function
Original comment by Van...@gmail.com
on 15 Mar 2012 at 9:34
I have a multiplatform project using glog, and this deprecated support to
strstream happened to me while building the library to Android.
I'm attaching a patch for the SVN version (revision 115). Actually, it solves
two problems at once: removes the deprecated strstream usage (and some
old-style char pointer vectors), and includes the flag HAVE_POSIX_FADVISE and
ANDROID to the build, making the library compatible with Android NDK (tested
against android-ndk-r8).
This patch has been tested over Windows, Linux, Mac OSX, Android and iOS, but
using an alternative build system (CMake).
Original comment by gu...@nymgo.com
on 23 Oct 2012 at 10:12
Attachments:
Sorry for the latency...
Thanks for the patch! But, sorry, google's internal version of glog has already
fixed this issue, so I'd use the internal version to minimize diffs between the
opensource version and the internal version.
http://code.google.com/p/google-glog/source/detail?r=119
I cannot test the android part of your patch right now. If you kindly update
the patch for android, I'll apply it. Otherwise, I'll try to modify your patch.
Anyway, we need to ask you to sign our Contributor License Agreement. If you
didn't yet, could you sign our Individual Contributor License Agreement,
please? It
seems that we need to ask you to sign this to avoid any troubles. The
process is just submitting an HTML form, and it shouldn't take your
time so much.
http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
Please note that these forms do not transfer copyright: the
contributor retains her ownership in the work. The CLA just grants
Google a "perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free, etc..." right to use
the work, sublicense it, and so on.
Original comment by shinichi...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2013 at 4:13
I fixed this using google's internal change.
http://code.google.com/p/google-glog/source/detail?r=119
Original comment by shinichi...@gmail.com
on 25 Jan 2013 at 6:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Van...@gmail.com
on 16 Jan 2012 at 4:23