Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by schmi...@gmail.com
on 23 Apr 2010 at 11:19
Serge is implementing a sparseW property for W that's faster then that changes
we made in DC.
Original comment by schmi...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2010 at 9:20
lag_sparse is much faster than lag_array so eventually we might just drop
lag_array. also, if we move the id check
out of spatial lag and assume y is in the proper order (or have the user adjust
y accordingly prior to calling lag)
we can probably use just a single lag function here.
i'm holding off on these changes until the sparse builder gets optimized
Original comment by sjsrey
on 17 May 2010 at 11:58
Original comment by sjsrey
on 23 Jul 2010 at 4:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
schmi...@gmail.com
on 23 Apr 2010 at 10:27