Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Subsequently I came across the document for creating nameservers
(http://code.google.com/p/scalr/wiki/ConfiguringNameservers) and it has named
in the
example as the system user. It's not clear in the docs that it must be named.
However, in the event that the choice is taken to use root instead of a system
user
(as is suggested at the end) then the same error will occur since named doesn't
exist.
Original comment by rob.mo...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2008 at 9:38
In the case of an Ubuntu installation, the user bind probably is the best choice
because /etc/bind/rndc.key is owned by bind. However, it does require that the
bind
user's shell be changed to something other than /bin/false (e.g., /bin/sh) and
it may
raise security concerns (that is, it raises the question as to why bind was
given a
/bin/false shell in the first place while some other system accounts have
/bin/sh as
their shell).
So to sum up, it would be nice to have the RemoteBIND class take the user value
from
a configurable value such as the login username.
Original comment by rob.mo...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2008 at 9:50
Also, if the bind user approach is taken then the /etc/bind/named.conf.local
file and
/etc/bind/zones directory owner need to be changed to bind (or alternatively
write
permission can be given to the group).
Original comment by rob.mo...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2008 at 10:59
Original comment by alex.kovalyov@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2008 at 5:50
Original comment by dicsydel@gmail.com
on 5 Jan 2009 at 7:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rob.mo...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2008 at 4:04