Thanks for your great work!
When I'm trying to reproduce the result of DIM(Deep Image Matting), I found that using vgg model without BN and setting batch-size to 1 will give the same or even better performance, comparing to the results reported by the original DIM paper.
So I think that fewer training data is not supposed to be the reason for different performance.
Thanks for your great work! When I'm trying to reproduce the result of DIM(Deep Image Matting), I found that using vgg model without BN and setting batch-size to 1 will give the same or even better performance, comparing to the results reported by the original DIM paper.
So I think that fewer training data is not supposed to be the reason for different performance.