Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
thanks for reporting! unfortunately, this corresponds to a known limitation, as
mentioned in the tutorial (please see the section 'python subset
rescrictions'). but
I will keep this issue open for a while at least, to remind me I should
probably add
a warning for this..
interesting you used WINE. unfortunately, there are still a few known issues
with
shedskin under WINE: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21388
Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 7:29
Yes, a warning would be OK, at least, for now. I was a bit skepticall when
trying to
compile that code, and I got excited when shedskin didn't complain at all. But
then,
make failed.
I agree it isn't that important to implement. In fact, I find an array of
functions
is something... weird.
I was using wine for cross-compiling, which so far has worked perfectly for me.
It
should be doable without wine and using a mingw cross-compiler directly, but I
was
lazy :D.
I might try to compile something shedskinned with winelib if get very bored. It
*should* work if shedskin generated code compiles under mingw...
Original comment by ssorga...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 8:11
yeah, I have to be a bit picky about which features I spend my time on, and I
don't
consider lists of functions to be very useful either, plus I think the current
type
analysis would not be suitable for doing this at this point. I would probably
prefer
to work on supporting method references first.
Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com
on 20 Feb 2010 at 11:21
I will leave the issue open until there is a good warning for this problem.
Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2010 at 8:04
warning added, thanks again for reporting!
http://code.google.com/p/shedskin/source/detail?r=1290
Original comment by mark.duf...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2010 at 2:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ssorga...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 9:17