Currently, the artifact name for this project is just reflect (or reflect_sjsX). That's a bit weak. It does not even mention Scala, and "reflect" is super generic. The organization name disambiguates somewhat, but that wouldn't work if someone publishes a fork.
I suggest we change the artifact name to portable-scala-reflect, which is very clear and unambiguous. Note that scala-reflect is out of question, since it is already the name of the core Scala reflection library.
Currently, the artifact name for this project is just
reflect
(orreflect_sjsX
). That's a bit weak. It does not even mention Scala, and "reflect" is super generic. The organization name disambiguates somewhat, but that wouldn't work if someone publishes a fork.I suggest we change the artifact name to
portable-scala-reflect
, which is very clear and unambiguous. Note thatscala-reflect
is out of question, since it is already the name of the core Scala reflection library.@gzm0 @densh Does that make sense?