Please, SDNEXT backcompatibility.....

[RGX650]

I am not a developper, and i struggle to make it on my own really... https://github.com/RGX650/sd-webui-bmab.git

I would be SO GRATEFULL !!!

[portu-sim]

Does SDNEXT means this project? https://github.com/vladmandic/automatic

[RGX650]

Yes!

[Sunsphire]

I would love to see this working in SD.Next / Vladmandic repo!

[RGX650]

I would love to see this working in SD.Next / Vladmandic repo!

i think i am almost done, maybe tonight or tomorrow...

[RGX650]

@Sunsphire you can git clone my repo, i have not tested it properlly yet, but you can use it now. Please dont hesitate to give me some feedback. (as i said previously I am not a developper, but i spent A LOT of time on it. @portu-sim I would really appreciate some review and inspection on my fork, please please please.... https://github.com/RGX650/sd-webui-bmab-SDNEXT

[portu-sim]

@RGX650 I'll check it..

[portu-sim]

@RGX650 Can you check out dev branch, fix the code and pull request your code?

[RGX650]

i added you as collaborator.

Also: https://github.com/vladmandic/automatic/issues/2584

[vladmandic]

thanks for the work! see https://github.com/vladmandic/automatic/issues/2584#issuecomment-1863608958 for a bit more detailed response.

[RGX650]

MY CURRENT (self aware) PROBLEMATICS: (i might have more, fell free to enlight me!)

• regarding RNG.py : what would be the difference between using SDNEXT's "devices.backend" instead of the added shared.opts.randn_source ?

• slider value synch between my BMAB's added shared.opts and SDNEXT's quick settings sliders ?

https://github.com/RGX650/sd-webui-bmab-SDNEXT/blob/main/sd_bmab/sd_override/txt2img.py

• SDNEXT StableDiffusionProcessingTxt2Img hasn't post init, so i used def init (self, kwargs) and super init (kwargs) instead. Also Field is not used in SDNEXT version i am struggle regarding how BMAB StableDiffusionProcessingTxt2ImgOv class should inherits shape, seeds, subseeds, etc regarding its def sample(...) and its self.rng = rng.ImageRNG(...)

• SDNEXT hypertile seams implemented differently than in A1111, i just added hypertile_set(self) as i a barbarian in BMAB StableDiffusionProcessingTxt2ImgOv def sample

https://github.com/RGX650/sd-webui-bmab-SDNEXT/blob/main/sd_bmab/sd_override/samper.py

• HELP regarding: SDNEXT KDiffusionSampler modules.sd_samplers_kdiffusion compatibility

[RGX650]

However - besides torch size errors, in some case - i would say it is "running" (SDNEXT version update of the 20/12/23)

[portu-sim]

CLOSE THIS ISSUE.