Closed jrycw closed 1 month ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 83.51%. Comparing base (
7eae1f2
) to head (25774f2
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Thanks for taking the time to implement this---I left some thoughts in the comments. I'm open to this, but trying to get a feel for where the selection API is going? (suspecting it might not change too much?). If it's okay with you, let's wait a bit and collect more info on the pl.col()
vs selector situation.
@machow , thank you for your response. Let's hold off for now and see how things progress. I'll mark this PR as a draft for the time being. On another note, it appears that our project is gaining more attention from the community. I suggest that we tidy up the finished issues before the next minor release (0.6.0). This way, future contributors can easily identify and tackle the issues they want to help with.
I'll close this PR since the column selection of Polars
is being refactored through #360 and is included in version 0.6.1.
Related to #340.
This PR aims to extend column selection to support
Polars
expressions.