Open schloerke opened 1 year ago
I agree that a monorepo seems like it would make sense here--I almost suggested it when you asked for this repo but figured I'd just give you what you asked for :)
Would be curious if others have strong opinions here.
I'm in favor of a monorepo. 👍
Cool. I'm guessing we'd want to have shinylive be the monorepo and put py-shinylive and r-shinylive in subdirectories. Looks like we can do that with git and preserve the commit histories along with it.
(Can probably exclude
quarto-ext/shinylive
as it is not a single version when released.)Whereas
r-shinylive
andpy-shinylive
have a fixed version ofposit-dev/shinylive
that they work with. ... so they should all be in the same repo.