Feature Request: Consider multiple roles

[khinshankhan]

Hi, I'd like to request multiple roles at the same company. I'd imagine in latex it may look a bit like (pseudo)

  \cventry
    {
      \begin{cvjob} % n roles below
        {Omnious. Co., Ltd.} % Organization
        {Seoul, S.Korea} % Location
    }
    {
      \begin{cvrole} % role 1
        {SeniorSoftware Architect} % Job title
        {Jun. 2017 - May. 2018} % Date(s)
    }
    {
      \begin{cvrole} % role 2
        {Software Architect} % Job title
        {Jun. 2016 - May. 2017} % Date(s)
    }
    {
      \begin{cvitems} % Description(s) of tasks/responsibilities
        \item {Provisioned an easily managable hybrid infrastructure(Amazon AWS + On-premise) utilizing IaC(Infrastructure as Code) tools like Ansible, Packer and Terraform.}
        \item {Built fully automated CI/CD pipelines on CircleCI for containerized applications using Docker, AWS ECR and Rancher.}
        \item {Designed an overall service architecture and pipelines of the Machine Learning based Fashion Tagging API SaaS product with the micro-services architecture.}
        \item {Implemented several API microservices in Node.js Koa and in the serverless AWS Lambda functions.}
        \item {Deployed a centralized logging environment(ELK, Filebeat, CloudWatch, S3) which gather log data from docker containers and AWS resources.}
        \item {Deployed a centralized monitoring environment(Grafana, InfluxDB, CollectD) which gather system metrics as well as docker run-time metrics.}
      \end{cvitems}
    }

Potentially even allowing job -> role 1 -> items -> role 2 -> other items? Linkedin handles this rather well.

[OJFord]

This has been requested multiple times - there are some suggestions for implementations in comments iirc.

You can also see my own (which is used very much like your pseudocode) at OJFord/curriculum-vitae - I've been meaning to compare to others' mentioned here and provide some canonical soluti9, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

[OJFord]

297

(Though I notice my comment there is a little out of date, I now do it more like your suggestion as above.)