Closed johannesbottcher closed 8 years ago
I cannot understand abbreviations in your message. What is LC and OP?
Is there any problem cuz of MIT License and my copyright? I need more explanations!
LC => Latex community OP => original poster
You might want to add an explicit license info into the files. Alltough, personally, i think that MIT and other very open licenses aren't the best choice, as explained in my two opening comments in https://github.com/VelNZ/mastersdoctoralthesislatex/issues/6
Thanks for your kindness. I changed a License type by your suggestion! LPPL for class file, CC for LaTeX template.
Thanks!
Hi guys,
I concur that MIT is not always the most appropriate choice but CC BY-NC-SA for the resume template seems a little restrictive given that:
Is there any reason not to use LPPL across the board or go with CC BY SA, preserving attribution but allowing for commercial use?
Thanks!
Hi, I agree with your opinion, sorry for my lack of understanding about LICENSE. I changed License type for LaTeX template from CC BY-NC-SA to CC BY-SA.
Thanks to all of you !
Thanks @posquit0! -- this project has re-sparked my interest in LaTeX and it's been fun.
Hi there, i don't have time to look into this myself.
http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=26933&p=92672#p92672
By the way, the license of the repo is MIT, the class file is copyrighted to you. You may wanna loose a word about that to the OP.