Open possibly-sam opened 5 years ago
Static calculations are possible if we assume independent risks, and could be interesting to look at. Also:
Good point. I am thinking that for #1 it is almost a separate application. That is, the application has two almost independent parts. 1) Input and clean the data, and 2) Perform calculations and report on clean data. From that point of view, the typo question might fit in #1.
For #2, i was thinking that if we had detailed descriptions of the risks, we could do a textual analysis for similar terms and assume some correlation. If two risks both have a phrase like 'LTL Trucking Delivery' in them, it might be reasonable to assume a correlation.
Yes, both of those make sense to me. Those textual indicators can also be used to indicate to users if they are possibly duplicating risks that already exist - human-in-the-loop augmentation rather than full automation.
Meeting Room Booked
Holborn - Meeting room 410 St.Giles, 154 Southampton Row, Holborn, London, WC1B 5AL Date: Saturday 11 May Start time: 11:00AM Duration: 4 Hours Guests: 4
Faster(?) version updated to https://north-loop-designs.shinyapps.io/mcfc03/
Initial thoughts on the Black Swan Lever..
Guys where is the link to the clean set of data for download & analysis?
https://github.com/possibly-sam/mcfc01/blob/master/risk_KA_11.csv
risk_KA_11.csv was the file that Ken prepared and that we used in the last hackathon. It is the one I have continued to use for all my testing.