Closed whaaaley closed 8 years ago
I like this vendor prefix indent in CSS too :).
But it is a different indent-based syntax. Indent is very important for SugarSS and other indent-based syntax. So I think that having special case for it will be very dangerous for SugarSS maintainability and simplicity.
Especially because with Autoprefixer we have only few cases. For example, Autoprefixer supports appearance: none
, so even you don’t need vendor prefixes here :).
Indents need to be four spaces to be recognized, according to what I know. Just throwing that out there.
This is low priority, but I'd like to indent my non-standard vendor prefixes. Do you think this should work? I remember reading somewhere about when mixing tabs/spaces that as long as it's indented more it should work.