search

postcss / sugarss

Indent-based CSS syntax for PostCSS
MIT License
710 stars 39 forks source link

Project logo #7

Closed ai closed 8 years ago

ai commented 8 years ago

I think this project need separated logo. But let’s avoid Schutzstaffel associations ;).

/cc @janmarek

1j01 commented 8 years ago

Maybe try Inkscape? (I was gonna try to do it in a bit)

corysimmons commented 8 years ago

https://github.com/postcss/sugarss/pull/14 fixed

1j01 commented 8 years ago

I'll still do a PR for the linking I described (once that's merged).

1j01 commented 8 years ago

Okay, I wasn't able to edit it in Inkscape or SVG-edit: eh eh, "better"

But, I was able to copy the "HTML" from Chrome and then edit it in Inkscape: image

I removed the text, and fixed the dots going off the cube and one of the corners of the cube. But I still couldn't (add back and) edit the text. I don't know why the text's path is getting janked up. The font appears to be Manual Sans Exbo, but it's not a free font. I could probably just trace a screenshot of the SVG into the SVG to get a non-broken path and then delete the C and move the SS over, but I don't know. Is this font licenced? Besides that, it just feels silly.

1j01 commented 8 years ago

It's not even that hard. So I did it, hopefully legally:

updated logo with text

1j01 commented 8 years ago

Opened https://github.com/postcss/sugarss/pull/15

ai commented 8 years ago

@corysimmons yeap, @1j01 @dbox are right, SVG file has some problem on Linux preview. It will be nice if somebody will fix it.

jt3k commented 8 years ago

more dirty sketches with hexagon hexagon - is nodejs sugar is brick sugar is white death, but black sugar is black life! %)

ai commented 8 years ago

@jt3k looks nice. But too closer for abstract logos, which, I think, will not work in open source. We need more emotions and story.

jt3k commented 8 years ago

yepp! i think, the character from the cartoons on the logo looks better