Closed valentin-nasta closed 8 months ago
Dear @valentin-nasta ,
Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately, we are unable to address similar reports and issues without specific suggestions. However, we are open to concrete suggestions related to security.
Upon examining the information provided on https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-5363 , it appears that only the "bookworm" version is affected by the DSA-5532-1 issue, not "bullseye". Currently, our image is based solely on "bullseye" and is very simple, as shown here: https://github.com/postgis/docker-postgis/blob/master/15-3.4/Dockerfile. Therefore, I believe this to be a false positive result, which we cannot act upon.
Please read more :
I tested with the following command: trivy image --ignore-unfixed postgis/postgis:15-3.4
The scan results showed no vulnerabilities (Total: 0 for all severity levels) for the postgis/postgis:15-3.4 (Debian 11.9).
$ trivy image --ignore-unfixed postgis/postgis:15-3.4
2024-03-15T17:40:39.291+0100 INFO Vulnerability scanning is enabled
2024-03-15T17:40:39.291+0100 INFO Secret scanning is enabled
2024-03-15T17:40:39.291+0100 INFO If your scanning is slow, please try '--scanners vuln' to disable secret scanning
2024-03-15T17:40:39.291+0100 INFO Please see also https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy/v0.49/docs/scanner/secret/#recommendation for faster secret detection
2024-03-15T17:40:39.330+0100 INFO Detected OS: debian
2024-03-15T17:40:39.330+0100 INFO Detecting Debian vulnerabilities...
2024-03-15T17:40:39.357+0100 INFO Number of language-specific files: 1
2024-03-15T17:40:39.357+0100 INFO Detecting gobinary vulnerabilities...
postgis/postgis:15-3.4 (debian 11.9)
Total: 0 (UNKNOWN: 0, LOW: 0, MEDIUM: 0, HIGH: 0, CRITICAL: 0)
If you agree that the result on https://osv.dev/vulnerability/DSA-5532-1 is a false positive, please report this feedback on the security scanner’s website you used, in hopes that the issue might be corrected.
Unfortunately, false positive CVE issues are quite common, as evidenced by:
If the Debian-based image does not meet requirements,
it might be worthwhile to consider trying out the Alpine-based Docker images. postgis/postgis:15-3.4-alpine
@ImreSamu thank you for the quick reply! Indeed looks like a false positive also to me after checking the link you provided - https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-5363
I will check with security admins of the website this was reported and keep this issue updated.
I learned quite a few tips from your detailed reply. 👍 That is indeed a false positive, therefore I'll close this issue. ℹ️
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/DSA-5532-1