postlund / pyatv

A client library for Apple TV and AirPlay devices
https://pyatv.dev
MIT License
827 stars 87 forks source link

build(deps): Bump pytest-asyncio from 0.23.2 to 0.23.6 in /requirements #2377

Open dependabot[bot] opened 1 month ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bumps pytest-asyncio from 0.23.2 to 0.23.6.

Release notes

Sourced from pytest-asyncio's releases.

pytest-asyncio 0.23.6

0.23.6 (2024-03-19)

  • Fix compatibility with pytest 8.2 #800

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

pytest-asyncio 0.23.5.post1

0.23.5 (2024-02-09)

  • Declare compatibility with pytest 8 #737
  • Fix typing errors with recent versions of mypy #769
  • Prevent DeprecationWarning about internal use of asyncio.get_event_loop() from affecting test cases #757

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

pytest-asyncio 0.23.5

0.23.5 (2024-02-09)

  • Declare compatibility with pytest 8 #737
  • Fix typing errors with recent versions of mypy #769
  • Prevent DeprecationWarning about internal use of asyncio.get_event_loop() from affecting test cases #757

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

pytest-asyncio 0.23.5a0

0.23.5 (UNRELEASED)

  • Declare compatibility with pytest 8 #737
  • Fix typing errors with recent versions of mypy #769

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

pytest-asyncio 0.23.4

0.23.4 (2024-01-28)

  • pytest-asyncio no longer imports additional, unrelated packages during test collection #729
  • Addresses further issues that caused an internal pytest error during test collection
  • Declares incompatibility with pytest 8 #737

pytest-asyncio 0.23.4a2

0.23.4 (UNRELEASED)

  • pytest-asyncio no longer imports additional, unrelated packages during test collection #729
  • Addresses further issues that caused an internal pytest error during test collection

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

... (truncated)

Commits
  • c34da04 [docs] Mentioned pytest 8.2 compatibility fix in changelog.
  • 143f745 Fix compatibility with pytest 8.2 FixtureDef.unittest removal
  • 13d4b79 Remove unused function _removesuffix
  • cdd2c49 Use FixtureRequest instead of SubRequest
  • c3429fa Build(deps): Bump packaging from 23.2 to 24.0 in /dependencies/docs
  • 5f2338d Build(deps): Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.8.12 to 1.8.14
  • 726c6e0 Build(deps): Bump coverage from 7.4.3 to 7.4.4 in /dependencies/default
  • 8bd8288 Build(deps): Bump pytest from 8.0.2 to 8.1.1 in /dependencies/default
  • ef3b347 Build(deps): Bump packaging from 23.2 to 24.0 in /dependencies/default
  • b22d84e [docs] Fixes the example showing how to run all tests in a session-scoped loop.
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 88.90%. Comparing base (4b00261) to head (f933d53).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2377 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 88.91% 88.90% -0.02% ========================================== Files 168 168 Lines 11370 11370 ========================================== - Hits 10110 10108 -2 - Misses 1260 1262 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.