Closed boretom closed 5 years ago
the resolution makes one pixel span over two characters or not. then the width uses that count, so -r 1 will produce a larger image. In other words, the width isn't in terms of columns but rather in term of rendered pixels
Ok, I see. Thanks for clarifying it ... it's quite confusing but nevermind
Hi,
I'm playing around with catimg (the c app, not the script) and don't fully understand the width (-w) parameter.
Especially I don't see why setting the resolution to 1 or 2 has an impact on the image width. The terminal width (tput cols) is the same in both scenarios, no? Is it supposed to behave like that?
/Thomas