Closed progial-sas closed 3 years ago
Hi, Thanks a lot!
Indeed, it looks like another problem in extension detection. Are you using local mode or remote mode? For the record version 4.1.2 fixed a related problem in local mode (https://github.com/powa-team/powa-web/commit/60efdb3d222c4b880e45195fa69b542da46a0cb6).
We use local mode . It's a little weird , our package is tag 4.1.2 but 60efdb3 fix is not present. Neither this https://github.com/powa-team/powa-web/issues/123#issuecomment-748977067
We change python code , compile project, kill powa collector , but problem seem still there.
It's a little weird , our package is tag 4.1.2 but 60efdb3 fix is not present.
Are you using the rpm pgdg packages? If yes, I already reported it (see https://github.com/powa-team/powa-web/issues/130#issuecomment-791241091) but didn't have any answer for now. I'm assuming that the packages have been built assuming that both powa-archivist and powa-web would always have the same version, but it's not the case and we have a requirement on major.minor
only.
We change python code , compile project, kill powa collector , but problem seem still there.
Did you mean powa-web?
Are you using the rpm pgdg packages?
Yes it is absolutely true...
grep VERSION /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/powa/__init__.py __VERSION__ = '4.1.0'
Did you mean powa-web?
No, we change code in /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/powa/framework.py. Maybe there is an easy way to do it.
Yes it is absolutely true... grep VERSION /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/powa/init.py VERSION = '4.1.0'
Ah then you're 2 patch releases late :(
@devrimgunduz do you plan to publish a new package for powa-web 4.1.2, and is there anything I can do to help the packaging? I think it would be good to have different powa-archivist and powa-web packages versions.
No, we change code in /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/powa/framework.py.
I was wondering about killing powa-collector. If you're using the local mode you shouldn't be using it, as powa-collector will explicitly ignore the local server. Also, did you restart powa-web after the changes? I think it should be reloaded automatically by it doesn't hurt to make sure.
Maybe there is an easy way to do it.
Unfortunately no, and I think that manually modifying files handles by packages can have some bad effect on RHEL and similar.
What you could do is download current version (either a zip/tgz archive or clone the repository), stop the powa-web service and manually start this freshly downloaded version instead. If that fixes your problem at least we'll know that you're only missing a more recent package.
Done. 4.1.2-3 is in the RPM repos.
Thanks a lot Devrim!
Awesomes guys ! Thanks both of you , it works very well!
Great news!
Hi, First, thanks for your job, powa is very useful!
I have a similar problem to #123 but all of our package are up to date. We migrate psql instance from 11 to 13 last week and upgrade all dependancies.
I check all point in #123 . I do a powa snapshot in debug mode and rowcount = 70
Now, we have:![Capture](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/86596993/123609609-18a50680-d800-11eb-801f-ff44e3f84ca6.PNG)
I test powa in 4.1.1 version and another test with qualstat in 2.0.2 but problem still there.
We have migrated 2 instances and both of them have this behavior. Have you any idea ? Regards ,