Closed styrmis closed 10 years ago
Thanks. Looks good to me. Second opinions?
One thing I've been wondering is if it wouldn't perhaps be better to just store the initialiser code directly in the repo and avoid accessing gists at all as that would prevent released versions from breaking when GitHub makes changes.
On 1 Feb 2014, at 05:04, Thomas Klemm notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks. Looks good to me. Second opinions?
\ Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Actually I rather favor updating the Github gist urls every now and then when they change (how often can they? ;) ) than making the get_gist
method more complex. The current redirection might not last forever on the Github side. I've updated all urls in #96.
Thanks again reports that a redirect is taking place and efforts in putting this PR together, Stefan.
References Issue https://github.com/rodreegez/powder/issues/93