Closed ducpt-bili closed 1 week ago
Btw, i just found this post: https://www.powersync.com/blog/react-native-database-performance-comparison Does it show us that Powersync is the best out there?
As shown by those benchmarks, for most use cases the performance difference between the various options is not massive. There is a bit of gain in using JSI, which is the case for both op-sqlite and react-native-quick-sqlite. For general react-native use cases, I'd recommend op-sqlite.
Our fork of react-native-quick-sqlite here is generally to:
We'll likely move PowerSync over to op-sqlite in the future, since it seems like we'll be able to support all those without maintaining a separate fork.
hi @rkistner , i hope the move over will be process as soon as possible. Just one more question, when move to op-sqlite, our app will perform the same right?
hi @rkistner , i hope the move over will be process as soon as possible. Just one more question, when move to op-sqlite, our app will perform the same right?
Yes, we expect performance to be the same or perhaps slightly better on op-sqlite.
hi @rkistner , i mean when i use old version sqlite of Powersync, then later when upgrade Powersync using new version (op-sqlite), does everything in our user mobile app will be work the same? Thanks
Yes, it will continue using the same database file, and the PowerSync APIs will remain the same
Also in favor of this move to help support running with the new architecture
We now have an alpha version of this available here: https://github.com/powersync-ja/powersync-js/tree/main/packages/powersync-op-sqlite
Hi powersync team, op-sqlite is much faster and active maintain from the author. I just want to ask, does it support underly by Powersync right now? or you are using quick-sqlite to decide to try Powersync. Thanks