Open annetill opened 2 years ago
Indeed, more information could be very interesting: for example, in other tools, we also get some information about the generators that reached their limit.
We could also add some information for phase shifters.
Some functional/design questions to be discussed:
Do we consider those new results as a new "category" of results which we could name "regulation results" ? I think it would be relevant, because it's a little different from the existing branch / bus results which are just "state" result, not results about what has acted
Do we want to get those results:
A feature.
In a
BranchResult
we can monitor active and reactive flows.After the base case and after each contingency, it would be great to monitor also the tap position of a transformer, that could changes if the transformer voltage control is active.
Following the same principle, a
ShuntCompenstorResult
has to be created to monitor reactive flow at connection terminal and the section count, that could change if the shunt voltage control is active.What is the expected behavior?
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, spectrum, etc)
(if a question doesn't apply, you can delete it)