Closed vnmabus closed 2 years ago
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 852264456d3673f0d34c78e99655dfd39b21ead6 into ea51d1fe26fe8ff9977414a8dc6d0b80ff06f05e - view on LGTM.com
new alerts:
There are two tests that fail because they consider that a type is not a callable (which is false, as a type implement __call__
).
Merging #395 (2f9308e) into master (ea51d1f) will decrease coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #395 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.22% 97.22% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 48 48
Lines 12059 12058 -1
==========================================
- Hits 11724 11723 -1
Misses 335 335
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pygame_menu/_decorator.py | 98.68% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/menu.py | 96.58% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/themes.py | 98.47% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/utils.py | 96.94% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/version.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/widgets/core/widget.py | 97.75% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/widgets/widget/button.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/widgets/widget/dropselect_multiple.py | 98.78% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/widgets/widget/label.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pygame_menu/widgets/widget/menulink.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 2 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ea51d1f...2f9308e. Read the comment docs.
There are two tests that fail because they consider that a type is not a callable (which is false, as a type implement
__call__
).
You're right, I've updated the tests and removed some unused imports. Do you plan to add another feature to this new version? Let me know to publish it to pypi
I am not sure, as I am testing things as we go with the migration. I however have to say that removing is_callable
is potentially a breaking change, as it was public. I am not sure if I should add it back with a deprecation notice, or how do you want to deal with that.
I'll a shorthand in utils. It will be removed in v5
I think this PR is ready to merge
Use
callable
instead, which is a Python builtin and accepts also objects with a__call__
method. Fixes #394.