Seeing which suggestions were actually good and make sense is literally impossible

[Okorin]

once an issue is resolved and fixed it is no longer there, the description what the issue was is all that remains as well as all the discussion attached to it. People can't see if these made the map worse or better - or in case of a remap or major change you can't even reconstruct what the issue means by looking at the map.

If you can't see if a suggestion made the map better or worse or what the map looked like at the time the issue was mentioned, then why bother going through suggestions and upvoting them you're just upvoting stuff based on how nice the suggstion sounded or if the mapper liked it or whatever - especially if you're not involved in the map itself unless upvoting unless downvoting isnt supposed to be for everyone

[peppy]

what do you see as a solution to this?

[Loctav]

Versioning of beatmaps is the only thing that comes into my mind. If you can easily access "previous versions" of the beatmap and see how it used to be (see wiki revision history or git version history), then you can also decide for yourself whether or not the suggestion actually made it better or worse.

[Xinnoh]

Ability to sort based on variables would make it easier to go through the discussion.

Sort by latest reply / comment: Controversial things that need discussing will have more people commenting on them Sort by number of comments in a discussion: Same as above Sort by upvotes: Important issues have more upvotes from other people that think the same (abusable) Sort by modder: Some users will be better at picking up important issues, new modders might only say fix blanket. (Could extend to sort either by user's role (bn/qat) or user's kudosu)