Closed ilya-bobyr closed 1 year ago
could you fix the lint issue?
could you fix the lint issue?
What is the issue? The CI seems to show all checks as successful:
All checks have passed 18 successful checks
Update. Ah, sorry, I can see it now - in the review view.
Vim documentation says that default values for arguments are fair game.
And I am actually using this code for a few weeks now. It works correctly.
:LspStopServer
works both with and without an argument.
I can change lsp#ui#vim#stop_server(stop_all, name = '')
to lsp#ui#vim#stop_server(stop_all, ...)
and then use a:0
, a:1
or a:000
to deal with the optional name.
But as an optional name
is what I want and as Vim script supports it, this would be a workaround just to avoid the linter parser limitation.
Do you want to make this change?
We should make the change. Not sure if older versions of vim will have issues. Some devs use the one that ships with OS and they are not fan of updating to latest version. Specially for those using LTS versions that barely update vim.
Rebased, addressed two linter issues, and added quotes around server names. Here is a complete diff: https://github.com/prabirshrestha/vim-lsp/compare/0b0db777524f127f965768286623407f7ada5992..6e35c234a44e4d32ea578adb1fdcf3f05b784c5c
@prabirshrestha Please, take a look.
Merged. Thanks!
It is convenient to be able to stop all LSP servers, regardless of the currently active buffer.
Also, it seems confusing that when a server name is specified, it is only stopped if it is also one handling the current buffer type. I would imagine it is quite rare to have more than one server handing a specific buffer type. And if one explicitly specified a name, it seems reasonable to stop this particular server, regardless of the currently active buffer.