Open pradyunsg opened 7 months ago
See #785 where @humitos reached out about these upcoming changes on their end.
Hmm... I think I might need to know the details of how things work on the client-side (https://github.com/readthedocs/addons/issues/59) to make progress here.
I wasn't able to document the process in a clear way yet, but I did the implementation of what I think is a good pattern to follow using our own theme at https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/pull/1526. I'd appreciate any feedback you may have about it.
I did the same for CPython at https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/116966 that you can also take a look. The usage of the data is the same, but it changes how the flyout/selectors are generated. Let me know. I'm happy to help here.
Hmm... http://docs.devthedocs.org/_/addons/?project-slug=docs&version-slug=latest&client-version=0.12.0&api-version=1 from description of https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/pull/1526 is a 404 for me.
Just to make sure my understanding correct:
If that understanding is correct, then I have the following questions:
Is it feasible to have a transition like the following?
RtD Functionality | Now | Now + t1 | Now + t2 | Now + t3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Existing behaviours | ๐ข | ๐ข | ๐ | ๐ด |
New behaviours | ๐ด | ๐ข | ๐ข | ๐ข |
๐ข: Functional for RtD projects built during this period. ๐ : Deprecated, functional for RtD projects built during this period. ๐ด: Non-functional.
(this would mean that I could just wait until the new client is being injected-when-serving in all newly-built docs and also would have confidence that any new RtD build would work correctly)
Is there any way for the theme to check whether the new functionality is going to be enabled / the new client would be injected etc during the build process?
Could you help me figure out what would be equivalent to the things I'm doing in Furo's conf.py gated behind a dev-only conditional + some static files, which functionally is trying to inject all the pieces that RtD's current build-process injection would inject?
Ideally, I'd prefer to not need to change browser configuration to make things work (I need to test against multiple browsers on multiple platforms somewhat regularly, and the current workflow involves doing so with a network-local server that is accessed from different machines on the network ๐ ).
Oh, and thanks for reaching out! It's appreciated! ^>^
Hmm... http://docs.devthedocs.org/_/addons/?project-slug=docs&version-slug=latest&client-version=0.12.0&api-version=1 from description of readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#1526 is a 404 for me.
Ups... That's a development instance URL. The one from production is https://docs.readthedocs.io/_/addons/?project-slug=docs&version-slug=latest&client-version=0.12.0&api-version=1
We've already made the changes for this pattern. Following your table, we are at Now + t1, were the old behavior is still working and the new behavior is deployed as well.
Projects using build.commands
on their configuration file and/or opting-in into beta addons from project's setting are getting the new behavior: the JS client is automatically injected on each page.
Related blog posts:
I think this answers most of your questions and gives you a way to play around with this. You can see a live example of the implementation from our theme in our own documentation (it uses the PR that I shared previously): https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
3. Could you help me figure out what would be equivalent to the things I'm doing in Furo's conf.py gated behind a dev-only conditional + some static files, which functionally is trying to inject all the pieces that RtD's current build-process injection would inject?
Yes, but I'm leaving now ๐ . I will come to this issue tomorrow's morning.
3. Could you help me figure out what would be equivalent to the things I'm doing in Furo's conf.py gated behind a dev-only conditional + some static files, which functionally is trying to inject all the pieces that RtD's current build-process injection would inject?
I opened https://github.com/pradyunsg/furo/pull/797 to talk more about this directly in the code, since I think it will be easier to know exactly what we are doing and where. Let me know if this is helpful as a first step.
I will come to this issue tomorrow's morning.
It wasn't tomorrow, but close enough ๐
I just want to check here if you were able to take a look at the PR that I opened that explains a little how to integrate the new Read the Docs Addons. I'm happy to help here with this work, but I would need to understand how do you run the tests so I can experiment with that. Let me know if there is anything else here I can do to help with this.
I wanted to share an update about our deprecation plan here ^1:
I'd appreciate any feedback you may have about this plan. Also, I'm happy to help you with any code modification required on furo or on any other theme you are involved. Let me know ๐๐ผ
๐๏ธ We are about to publish a post in our blog about this plan: https://github.com/readthedocs/website/pull/308
This has been on my radar but free time hasn't been coming around often enough to get to this. Pesky things like cutting pip releases keep getting in the way.
@humitos looks like you already went forward with this for new projects, as a project I created today doesnโt integrate anymore (html_context doesnโt seem to be manipulated).
You say youโre suggesting sphinx-build-compatibility
, but thatโs not on PyPI.
Hi @flying-sheep. New projects are using the new behavior, as you already noticed. We announced this in our blog at https://about.readthedocs.com/blog/2024/07/addons-by-default/
Regarding the Sphinx extension, you can find it at https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx-build-compatibility/ and installing it directly from GitHub.
I'd appreciate any feedback you may have.
(from the phone ๐ฑ)
Thatโs pretty clumsy, I basically have to add this to conf.py
from importlib.util import find_spec
_sbc = (
["sphinx_build_compatibility.extension"]
if find_spec("sphinx_build_compatibility")
else []
)
extensions = [..., *_sbc]
then add a file docs.requirements-sbc.txt
:
sphinx-build-compatibility @ git+https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx-build-compatibility.git
then reference that in .readthedocs.yml:
python:
install:
- method: pip
path: .
extra_requirements:
- docs
+ - requirements: docs/requirements-sbc.txt
If you publish it on PyPI, @pradyunsg could at least do a hotfix where Furo would depend on that extension until Furo has migrated.
And itโs still not clean:
So, even installing that extension you are not getting the flyout properly integrated? If so, can you please open an issue on that extension that I mentioned in my previous comment so we can track it there, please.
Also, mention your read the docs project and the build link.
Oh, right. I'll try to make time this weekend for this (sorry, dealing with some family stuff that's needed attention so I've been slipping on a few things like this). ๐
I think by now the changes have rolled out โฆ
What's happening?
Read the Docs is going to make changes to both how they're building Sphinx projects as well as how they're injecting functionality into the rendered documentation sets.
https://github.com/readthedocs/addons is the upcoming JS client to enable this functionality, which would be injected server-side when serving HTML pages AFAICT.
Reproducer
N/A
Expectation
This issue would be resolved with Furo making changes to all the spots where it depends on some details related to RtD. As of 2024.04.27, these are:
Code of Conduct