Closed jerith closed 9 years ago
This is ready for review. Any suggestions for other things to factor out would also be helpful.
Looks sane to me. Do we want tests for things in the base classes?
We already have common tests that run across both subclasses, so I don't think tests on the base classes specifically would add much.
:+1: :ship:
RiakManager
andTxRiakManager
both have a lot of wrapper code around the underlying library objects, and there's a bunch of duplication here. This issue is for factoring out the common bits and adding a new wrapper around the client object that we can add extra things to later.(This is another case of pulling a piece of the big Riak manager cleanup/threadpool/whatever mudball out into its own smaller change.)