Closed justinvdm closed 8 years ago
Ready for review.
Planning on changing the base transport worker to have status event publishing capabilities in a separate PR.
Some minor comments, otherwise looks good.
I have a very bikesheddy comment -- would healthy connector
be a better name than status connector
? Trying to decide if it feels better enough to warrant running around and changing?
I have a very bikesheddy comment -- would healthy connector be a better name than status connector? Trying to decide if it feels better enough to warrant running around and changing?
Thought about this too, had a vague preference for 'health' over 'status' in general, but we already seem to refer to it as 'status' in junebug (e.g. status_url
), so I think consistency would be good.
Cool. Let's keep it as it is.
Ready for re-review.
:+1:
We need a way of publishing and consuming status event messages in workers.
The plan is to add two new connector types, one for publishing status event messages and one for consuming status event messages.