Feature Description
1:1, or at least more parity between Risks page export and Org page export.
Problem
Org page export has more useful information
Severity codes are not customer-readable in current json export
Protocol, host, port, path are not available in json export
Org page export has larger number of risks (risks are duplicated if on multiple ports [eg 80 and 443])
Description, impact, recommendations, identifiers are not in json export (empty in org export example I have)
Preferred Solution
Present severity in customer-readable format
Add protocol, host, port, path to json
Alternatives Considered
As we role into more comprehensive reporting, the way risks are presented and exported will be changing. A more comprehensive risks page export may naturally solve these issues.
To complete this one, we'll want to see a JSON proposal of the properties we'd like to include. @Dan-Crawford can you work with all stakeholders to create this?
Feature Description 1:1, or at least more parity between Risks page export and Org page export.
Problem Org page export has more useful information
Severity codes are not customer-readable in current json export Protocol, host, port, path are not available in json export Org page export has larger number of risks (risks are duplicated if on multiple ports [eg 80 and 443])
Description, impact, recommendations, identifiers are not in json export (empty in org export example I have)
Preferred Solution Present severity in customer-readable format Add protocol, host, port, path to json
Alternatives Considered As we role into more comprehensive reporting, the way risks are presented and exported will be changing. A more comprehensive risks page export may naturally solve these issues.