Closed amit-chaudhari1 closed 7 months ago
Following the ideas mentioned by @RobertDober here and here
There some issues that appear to be pre-split. I think we'll need to revisit and decide on if they are still earmark issue or earmark-parser issue.
Aside from triage of issues, I'd like to focus on
I'll also like to propose introduction to milestones and other project management chores to improve clarity and communication about what we are working towards currently.
Please treat this as a discussion for things that you'd like the maintainers to be focusing on.
I am completely fine with this
@pragdave if this is fine with you can you please grant all necessary rights to @amit-chaudhari1 ?
Thank you all (not forgetting @bradhanks
@amit-chaudhari1 can you please confirm that you have committement rights? I do not know about hex access, but for now I am happy to do the releases if you do not have access.
@amit-chaudhari1 can you please confirm that you have committement rights? I do not know about hex access, but for now I am happy to do the releases if you do not have access.
Having the chance to work with someone more experienced on board is a good opportunity for me. I could be pretty good at doing stuff like adding documentation, type specifications, formatting, refactoring, etc.
@amit-chaudhari1 can you please confirm that you have committement rights?
Yes, I can commit changes. I'm looking into what should I pick first. (I'm going to look at @bradhanks PRs #478 and #476 for now.)
I do not know about hex access
I also don't know about these, I'll look into this.
Having the chance to work with someone more experienced on board is a good opportunity for me. I could be pretty good at doing stuff like adding documentation, type specifications, formatting, refactoring, etc
Please do, I'm glad to have you. Let's work together :)
Happy to pass the puck on ;) I'll help as much as I can, if needed.
I'd like to pitch myself for maintaining earmark.