Closed HoshinoXxs closed 6 months ago
Hi @HoshinoXxs , thank you for reading the work.
I cloned the code and re-run it on my system without any changes, and it gives 96% for the test and 96.7% for val (evaluate.py) of what was proposed in the paper.
I hope you are providing the correct dataset path (raw EEG, not 5_95 Hz). Kindly cross-check it. The only error I got was missing the directory; the rest of the results are accurate.
Hi @HoshinoXxs , thank you for reading the work.
I cloned the code and re-run it on my system without any changes, and it gives 96% for the test and 96.7% for val (evaluate.py) of what was proposed in the paper.
I hope you are providing the correct dataset path (raw EEG, not 5_95 Hz). Kindly cross-check it. The only error I got was missing the directory; the rest of the results are accurate.
thanks for reply
after using the raw dataset, it works
thanks for excellent work when i run evluate.py in Triplet_LSTM/CVPR40, the model seems go wrong and unfitting
the model file is EEGStyleGAN-ADA-main/EEG2Feat/Triplet_LSTM/CVPR40/EXPERIMENT_29/bestckpt/eegfeat_all_0.9665178571428571.pth
the val files are: eeg_imagenet40_cvpr_2017/val
the result is as follow: [Epoch: 8042, Test KMeans score Proj: 0.0802407221664995] [0.02255639 0.04010025 0.01503759 0.02756892 0.03768844] cv_scores mean:0.02859032002115842
looking forward to a reply