prasanth13131 / geoxml3

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/geoxml3
0 stars 0 forks source link

If no marker is provided and the zoom option is enabled, the map gets centered in 0,0 lat lang after parsing #68

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Set the kmlLayerOptions with a map and zoom as true, and 
2. Create a kmlParser with this kmlLayerOptions.
3. Invoke parse function using an empty KML URL (i.e a URL that points to a KML 
file with no points) as a parameter

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Nothing should happen, but the map is centered in the middle of the ocean 
instead :-)

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
geoXML3.js

Please provide any additional information below.
Please find attached a patch that solves the problem (at least in my case)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by julian.m...@osoco.es on 1 Aug 2012 at 4:32

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by geocodezip on 1 Aug 2012 at 6:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is this a realistic use case?  Why would you want to display a kml file with no 
placemarks in it?  And if there aren't any placemarks, why does it matter where 
it zooms?

Original comment by geocodezip on 1 Aug 2012 at 8:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
In my own case, the kml file is generated dinamically depending some filters 
that the client can introduce on the application. When the client add more 
filters, some markers dissapears, but the geoposition is the same. 
Eventually, when client introduces one filter that trigger all makers to 
dissapear,
the geoposition changes to the pacific ocean, and the map only show water.

This only occurs if zoom is set as true. If it's false, the geopositon is 
always the same. 

Is for this that i think that if no markers are provided at the kml, is better 
don't do anything with the geoposition.

Regards

Original comment by julian.m...@osoco.es on 1 Aug 2012 at 10:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Fixed revision 86 (polys), revision 87 (kmz)

Original comment by geocodezip on 4 Aug 2012 at 3:17