Open muuki88 opened 8 months ago
@muuki88 - maybe we can just drop the whole validation? No clear to me that a validation like this is real valuable because it's already in the DB and this error isn't that much more helpful than just noticing that there aren't any bidders in the auction.
That would be even better IMHO. Because this escalates an error ( or purposely configured ad unit ) to the entire auction.
Care to submit a PR @muuki88 ?
Deleting code? Always 😍😎
Would like to discuss with the committee whether we should continue to hard-fail on missing imp[%d].ext.prebid.bidder.
We already have the scenario where bidders get removed due to lack of Purpose 2 consent - it's possible to take the view that the request/storedrequest should be allowed to not contain bidders.
We faced an issue with stored impressions that are not configured, but requested and thus crash the entire auction.
https://github.com/prebid/prebid-server-java/blob/ed1baacf6d92fefd42d04b72192a7a6282941bd5/src/main/java/org/prebid/server/validation/RequestValidator.java#L995-L1001
This validation doesn't allow us to create a stored impression that looks like this
instead we have to do something like this
Proposal
It would be great to disable certain validations. E.g.