Closed bollwyvl closed 1 month ago
That could make sense! Not sure how hard it would be as pixi can still read conda lock like format using rattler
Cool. Or, as pixi list
already has a lot of options, having an pixi export
(with explicit
as the first of perhaps several formats) would make sense.
Cool. Or, as
pixi list
already has a lot of options, having anpixi export
(withexplicit
as the first of perhaps several formats) would make sense.
Apixi export
command was also my first thought from hacking around in list
recently.
Will be implemented in: https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi/pull/1873
Huzzah! Looking forward to the next release!
Problem description
As always: thanks for pixi!
The creaky old
conda list --explicit --md5
format (broken hash, without PyPI deps, and all) is still the most portable thing for feeding into other tools such asconstructor
and dependency scanners.While it would be possible to make a third-party contraption that extracted this data from the
pixi.lock
file, if the structure of even that is in flux (#1172), having apixi list --explicit
in the near term is likely the easiest thing to offer to folk that are otherwise curious aboutpixi
, but need to ship installers.An extra magic bonus would be not having to re-calculate a matrix with something akin to
conda-lock
's template mechanism: