Closed SobhanMP closed 3 weeks ago
Ah that is strange, this is part of our Rattler library. This is the code that find the version: https://github.com/mamba-org/rattler/blob/main/crates/rattler_virtual_packages/src/libc.rs#L34
Does this ring a bell for you that might help us understand why it's not getting the version?
Also pinging @baszalmstra for his expertise
@SobhanMP What is the output when you run:
ldd --version
❯ ldd --version
ldd (Gentoo 2.39-r9 (patchset 9)) 2.39
Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.
regardless of whether having the string GLIBC or GNU LIBC is required or not, a fix is very much appreciated.
Im attempting a fix in https://github.com/mamba-org/rattler/pull/779
thanks!
Works like a charm! thanks.
Checks
[X] I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
[X] I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pixi, using
pixi --version
.Reproducible example
Issue description
I have glibc 2.39 on my machine, but Pixi doesn't recognize it as a valid
__glibc
, while Mamba does.Expected behavior
Pixi should recognize glibc 2.39