search

pressly / sup

Super simple deployment tool - think of it like 'make' for a network of servers
https://pressly.github.io/sup
MIT License
2.48k stars 176 forks source link

IS THIS PROJECT ABANDONED? #179

Closed insign closed 1 year ago

insign commented 2 years ago

Sorry for using this place. But the last release is from 2018. And Pressly looks was acquired. So.... What's is happening?

VojtechVitek commented 2 years ago

Hi, I don't have the time to maintain this project anymore. Any enthusiasts to take over?

insign commented 2 years ago

Well, I could take over the project, mainly to review pull requests and some adjustments, but since it is owned by a company which was acquired, are you willing to transfer ownership?

VojtechVitek commented 2 years ago

Sup is MIT licensed. There's no company lock-in besides having to keep the original copyright in the LICENSE file (can be amended).

I'm willing to add contributors to this project and/or move this repo to its own community organization if there's enough interest eventually.

However, I can't just transfer the repo to someone I don't really know yet -- no offence!

insign commented 2 years ago

@VojtechVitek np, probably would be weird just transfer it. I loved the idea behind the project. Maybe you by yourself should at least review the PR and maybe implement some tests to easily approve them.

mtroback commented 2 years ago

@insign I just found myself with a bunch of RPi on which I need to do just about the same commands over and over again. This project seems to fit my needs but it desperately would need the waiting PRs merged in order to work. Maybe it is easier for Vojtech whom obviously doesn't have time (which I totally understands) if you could take the contributor role and merge anything that looks good and then we, the users, needs to get back if something isn't working (with no hard feelings)?

VojtechVitek commented 2 years ago

I think I'll be able to merge PRs with decent high-level description and at least 2 reviews and working test-cases.

I case of new features, I'd appreciate some discussion up-front in Issues, so we don't waste anyone's development time too early.