Open dberardo-com opened 3 years ago
Hi @dberardo-com, It is not something widely tested, you may need to test it in-house. Also, you may need to evaluate performance if that's other criteria but if you are trying to solve a federation use case and looking for just access to timescaleDB data it may work for you.
hi @rohanpednekar , thanks for the quick answer.
My aim would be to use only one client connection to Presto from a ruby on rails application and sends all the requests through that connection.
Is it possible to "tell" Presto to bypass the query parsing and execution and passing it through to the underlying database to perform the query? This would be very useful for non-standard SQL queries, like "time_bucket" for example
@rohanpednekar here a reply to the same question on timescale's github: https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/issues/3452#issuecomment-891444900
how are "unknown" UDFs handled by Presto?
Considering https://github.com/prestodb/presto/issues/14579, I understand that it is not possible to use a user defined function from PostgreSQL via PrestoDB (I am only interested in query federation at this point) unless it is implemented as a PrestoDB plugin. Or did something change since the last comment of this thred? When I try, I simply get "Function not registered" error. Thanks in advance!
Hi community,
i was thinking whether it could be valuable to connect timescaleDB to an existing Presto engine using the JDBC connector.
My question would be: would it still be possible to use timescale specific (non SQL standard) queries in Presto (like time_bucket) or would it not work ?
thanks