Closed SnorlaxMonster closed 3 months ago
Calling it MON_OT_ID
would probably be slightly more consistent with the rest of the codebase, but that's just a nitpick.
I agree MON_OT_ID
would be slightly better, but it's fine as-is if you want to just merge.
I agree on MON_OT_ID, since we use the OT term everywhere.
The constant name MON_ID implies it relates to the ID number of the Pokémon itself; however, it actually refers to the Trainer ID number of the Pokémon's Original Trainer. Renaming it to MON_TRAINER_ID makes it substantially more clear what its meaning is.
The original definition of MON_ID is preserved in
macros/legacy.asm