Closed paulmelnikow closed 7 years ago
Other than that I went through it and it lgtm, but I'd like someone else to check it as well. Would this resolve #12?
The authors of this module should be contacted via the issue tracker.
Yes, I agree the language is confusing. The intent is to recognize the contributors, while channeling issues and support request to the project rather than the original contributors. The clearest way to do that would be to first explain how to get support, then acknowledge the contributors.
It's going to be a decent amount of effort to update across all those files. Probably worth scripting. We'd need to agree on the text first. How about we merge this, which is about updating links to this project, and then begin working that up in a separate PR?
Indeed #12 is what prompted me to do this, but as I re-read it, I think it's about keeping this page up to date as an index to all the modules. In the short term perhaps we can write a script to update that page from the module readmes. In the medium term this content is better presented on a website as suggested in #3.
Can anyone else give this a careful 👀 ?
@maximbaz Could I enlist your help to give this a once-over?
Thanks!
Do you think the language here is a bit confusing (ex from modules/archive/README.md):
I'm concerned that people will see the author and then end up back at the original repo instead of here. The flip-side of that is we'd need to get any submodule to update to the same thing (if consistency matters in this instance).