Closed nh13 closed 5 years ago
Thank you for the idea, but this enhancement is probably not our first priority. This should be relatively easy to achieve with the help of a small bash or PERL script. With 100K primer pairs you have to post-process the output with the help of some script anyway.
Unfortunately, I do have a script and it still takes too long to run the utility 100K+ times. My question was if you’d accept a PR (from me) not that you’d have to write it. My apologies if that wasn’t clear.
Feel free to open pull request, if thats what you meant by "appetite for a PR". It was not clear indeed :-).
I was wondering the appetite for a PR where we could batch many sequences to run
ntthal
. I want to perform 100K+ invocations ofntthal
, and I'd rather just sendntthal
a stream of data and have onentthal
process handle all the requests. I am only modifying the sequences I pass in (-s1
and-s2
) so I see a few options:-s1
and-s2
are not defined, thenntthal
reads in from standard input.-f
?) that specifies a file with input sequences to process.Thanks for considering this idea!