Liquidity tokens generated by the PrimitiveManager contract are currently following the ERC1155 standard.
This is a huge benefit for the PrimitiveManager at a contract level, but a bit limiting for the composability and the integration in other protocols, which are usually using ERC20.
A wrapper contract could be a very simple and effective solution to solve this problem. The specifications would be something like:
A wrapper contract would only target a specific pool
Users would deposit their liquidity tokens (ERC1155) to mint ERC20 tokens, and burn ERC20 tokens to get their liquidity tokens back
clemlak
commented
2 years ago
Liquidity tokens generated by the PrimitiveManager contract are currently following the ERC1155 standard. This is a huge benefit for the PrimitiveManager at a contract level, but a bit limiting for the composability and the integration in other protocols, which are usually using ERC20.
A wrapper contract could be a very simple and effective solution to solve this problem. The specifications would be something like: